I was quite disappointed that Brokeback Mountain
didn't win Best Picture at the Oscars the other night.
Part of me isn't really sure why, though. I've never
seen the movie. In fact, I've yet to see any of the
movies that were nominated in this category.
Furthermore, I don't even watch the Oscars. And like a
lot of American men, I have -- at most -- only a very
mild respect for the whole affair.
Still, I find myself taking a rooting interest in the
Best Picture award each year, in spite of being
unfamiliar with the nominees almost every single time.
(I never even heard of the movie that edged out
Brokeback Mountain, which was Crash. This weekend was
the first time I ever heard it referenced.) I think
the reason I take a rooting interest is sort of the
same as what I wrote in my Katrina article several
months ago (not the one about hemp and oil; the other
one, the one you called "such a crap"*). The media in
our culture presents stories and happenings in such a
way that you can pinpoint a "good guy" and a "bad guy"
in the proceedings -- or at least a protagonist and an
antagonist -- and root accordingly, depending on how
they affect you.
In 1994, the Best Picture favorite was Forrest Gump.
The underdog was a movie called Pulp Fiction. While
the odds were universally understood to be in favor of
the former, I found myself rooting for the latter as
it became more apparent towards Oscar time that the
underdog -- the little train that could -- might've
had what it took to unseat the favorite. And this was,
again, without having seen either of those movies.
It's not that it really mattered to me if Pulp Fiction
beat Forrest Gump; it's that I understood it was
possible, and that gave me hope -- it inspired me to
want to see it happen.
I've since seen them each numerous times. Pulp Fiction
is fantastic and devilish; a true classic, sordid as
it may be. Forrest Gump, on the other hand, tugs on
the heart strings. But that being said, it is one of
the best and most important American films that I've
seen. Using a then-new technique, it portrayed the
story of a fictional, mentally underdeveloped man,
inserted into real life footage of historical events
from the Vietnam era straight through to the 1990s. An
excellent film.
The funny thing is, though, neither Forrest Gump NOR
Pulp Fiction were quite the Best Picture of the Year,
in my opinion. Another movie nominated was Stephen
King's Shawshank Redemption, which is quite probably
the best American movie I've ever watched. I never
knew how great it was at the time, though. Like the
other two, I hadn't yet seen it. And so, to me, it was
simply a secondary character -- a bit player -- in the
Shakespearean drama unfolding between the mighty
antagonist, Forrest Gump, and its tragic challenger,
which was Pulp Fiction.
This is what things boil down to when all you
experience of the world is filtered through television
news.
CNN and Fox are more Shakespearean than you -- or even
they -- think.
This year I found myself rooting for Brokeback
Mountain for a number of reasons. I first heard it was
coming out (no pun intended) back in late summer, when
the boyfriend of a gay guy who works with my wife told
me when I wore a cowboy hat one day that a "gay
cowboy" movie was coming out later in the year. I was
immediately intrigued (and at the time I had no clue
that so-called "gay cowboys" -- a misnomer, since the
men in the film were actually shepherds -- were quite
common out on the range). Later, when the movie made
its release and I started to see commercials for it, I
could instantly tell just from those short clips that
it was going to be a powerful film, and I began
rooting for it to win some awards. I kept rooting for
it all the way through to the Oscars, at which time it
had already become something of a foregone conclusion
that it would win.
To be quite honest, at that point, I really should've
found myself rooting against it, in much the same way
as I found myself rooting against Forrest Gump without
having seen it back in '94. I usually go for the
underdog. It's just a natural thing with me. But I
kept rooting for Brokeback Mountain anyway, because as
much as it was favored to win, I knew deep down that
the odds were, in fact, stacked against it. It was
"supposed to" win, but, really, it wasn't. This made
me want like hell to see it happen. It made me want to
see the "little train that could" up-end its
competitors. Not because I had any real, valid reason
to root for it, but rather because -- as I said in my
article about Katrina -- I just sort of wanted to see
if it could.
This probably sounds like I'm comparing "the gay
cowboy movie" to a hurricane. That's not really my
point (just as it wasn't my point that I supported
Katrina's decision to be the worst hurricane in
American history). I found myself rooting for Katrina
because I had heard it could be the worst hurricane
ever, and a part of me deep down simply wanted to see
if it could do it. And likewise, I found myself
rooting for Brokeback Mountain, because I understood
that in spite of it being the "odds-on favorite,"
really, it wasn't. Not now. Not at this time in
America. Not even amidst the famously "leftist"
Hollywood crowd.
It was all about the struggle, and the story behind
it. The movie became the protagonist in an
against-all-odds tale, against the real-life odds of
whether a "gay cowboy movie" could "do it," could
really "win," in red, white, and blue-blooded America.
Which is why I suppose I was legitimately depressed
when I woke up the next morning and learned that it
couldn't.
This makes the story of Brokeback Mountain -- not the
story IN Brokeback Mountain, but OF Brokeback Mountain
-- a tragedy, by Shakespearean standards. But maybe
this tragedy is comparable to the story of Rocky, who
wasn't supposed to win and then, in the waning
moments, nearly snatched victory from the rabid,
clenched teeth of defeat.
Moral victories are euphemisms for "losses." But
sometimes there's beauty in losing. Sometimes it's
human. And sometimes we can learn more about who we
are and where we stand on this big, stupid planet that
way.
(If that's how I feel now, can you imagine how I'll
feel when I actually SEE the film?)
Copyright © 2006 Jonathan David Morris
* That had been upon light, surface reading. I was under the shock of the Katrina events and hadn't felt like rereading it more thoroughly, which I later did, explaining and qualifying my judgment. [the editor, alias CB]