STYLE LeftMargin 3,RightMargin 6,TopMargin 1,BottomMargin 1 WILBER.DAV Some Notes to the Letters, Leaflets, Newsletters & Booklet by DAVE WILBER, transcribed from some old handwritten notes. To me these writings are a curious mixture of social credit and constitutionalist notions, christianity and conspiracy theories, patriotism, natural health ideas and monetary and other freedom ideas. Trying to sort all of them out and to respond to all of them would have taken more time than I was willing to take. We share an opposition to legal tender and to most government paper money issues but not many of our definitions are alike. But some of them, in his "encyclopaedia", would make a good addition to my "SLOGANS FOR LIBERTY" collection. So much confused and rubbish material has been printed on the subject of money and almost flawless writings on it are so rare that most do never come across most of the better writings on money and are to that extent blameless for the views they hold or have adopted or developed from the "rubbish heap". I think among his main errors are the view that private banks are issuing legal tender currency and that the central banks are nothing but private banks. Who studies monetary legislation? Another error : That when money tokens are simply printed and then given the legal tender "quality" that thereby money is "created" rather than systematically and exploitatively destroyed. Mostly he implies that such "created" money is "spent", while only a fraudulent or coercive transfer and destruction of money is involved, under the pretence that something one owns is transferred in an exchange. But he contradicts the spending pretence in his statements saying that the first issuer of such money offers nothing in exchange and in the end of his 1984 circular "To all my good friends", he says : "Government spends nothing". He loves paradoxical to absurd sounding statements - which may get people to think or send them on an altogether wrong track. He assumes that "pumping in money" is a conspiracy and intentional rather than the result of government ignorance of proper financing and exchange media and value standard practices. He favours some gold redemptionism, not free and private gold value clearing, and wants legal tender laws repealed. He imagines that taxation is unnecessary, does not consider voluntary taxation or contribution schemes but imagines that "social credit" could finance government spending. See e.g. "Awake America", June 1984, 2nd. column : "Government is independent of taxation." Supposedly, government just taxes you to annoy you and that the inflation tax is not a tax! According to him - and many others government notes are counterfeit, although one can hardly counterfeit the OWN notes. At most one can issue many duplicates and call each of them an original. The theory and practice of tax foundation money without legal tender and gold redemptionism, but reckoning in gold weight values, seem to have passed him by. Monetarily he is a Protestant rather than a Catholic but then most Protestants are rather muddled on their main subject, too. He seems to have a long way to go before he becomes a moralist, rationalist, humanist and atheist in this sphere. May he find and pay attention to enough of the sound sign posts on his way. PIOT, J.Z., 5 December 1997.