R 65,J STYLE LeftMargin 3,RightMargin 6,TopMargin 1,BottomMargin 1 R 65,J SOME NOTES BY JOHN ZUBE, 30 DECEMBER 1997, TO : ANDREW DICKSON W H I T E : Fiat Money Inflation in France, written 1876, revised 1912. I had long postponed microfiching this book, although it isconsidered to be a libertarian classic. Firstly, it is probablystill available, in print on paper, from FEE, same address, atone of its usual low prices or from one or the other of its twoAustralian representatives. ( See Australian Freedom Addresses. )Secondly, I wanted to add some notes, since A.D. White seemed tome to be far better in describing the effects than the causes ofinflation. In my rush to fill more fiche for my libertarianmicrofiche publishing pilot scheme, I do usually prefer to addtitles which do not require, in my opinion, a comment from me. For the unique revisionist point of view of Ulrich von Beckerathon the monetary side of the French Revolution, see the lastpages, of his 1937/38 book "Public Insurance and CompensationMoney", reproduced in PP 11, on pages 258-266. On the legal tender aspect of inflation, I want to refer to mybrochure in PP 19 A : "Stop the $ X00 Million Legal TenderCrime." White mentions many interesting details but seems to believe thatlack of confidence and non-redemption in rare metals were moreimportant aspects of this and other inflations than are legaltender and the issue monopoly. He does not discuss an alternative and sound paper money with taxfoundation only, one that measures taxes, currencies and pricesin gold or silver weight units and is subject to a free marketrating and voluntary acceptance - for all but the tax offices,which would have to accept it at any time at par with its nominalvalue. Acceptance in payment for confiscated estates could have been anADDITIONAL security to assure the reflux of a paper money issuedbut it should not have been an exclusive one and could not be oneas reliable as as regularly levied taxes are or the "readiness toaccept foundation" is for shop currencies, that are in dailydemand for survival goods and services Almost all "land banks" were failures in practice and had to be,according to monetary theory, since they did not offer the basicfoundation required for any currency, namely its conversion intoready for sale goods and services. Why should the owners of goodsand services deliver them for mortgage bonds? Why should workersdepending on food and drink accept them instead of tickets tofood and drinks? One cannot eat dirt for long and survive. Taxfoundation and contribution or subscription foundation e.g. forinsurance money, can establish a similarly urgent daily demandfor currency among those forced to pay taxes and committed topaying their other dues and providing goods and services. To besound a currency must have "shop foundation". Then it is alsoreadily acceptable in payment of wages, salaries and other debtsas well. These are the main current turnovers for which a"currency" must be suitable or "current". The best comparison is"ticket money". A ticket to a brick or bit of timber within abuilding is not much good as currency, since such a good is notin urgent daily demand nor is a building sufficiently divisiblefor this or remaining sound, if it were. Money acceptable inpayment of weekly or monthly rents is another matter. In this way landlords could liquidize not the total capital value of theirreal estate but anticipate their current rent income by such"rent money" issues. The purchase of large capital goods or theirfinancial securities make up only a fraction of all turnoverspaid for in currency. They are thus not the main or ideal"redemption funds", "convertibility options" or covers requiredfor a liquid currency. Furthermore, large capital deals areusually not settled immediately, in cash but over a period, ininstalments, via credit. Consequently, it is mainly therelationship between the legal tender cash ( or sound andcompetitive and market rated as well as refusable private cash )and the ready for sale consumer goods and services thatdetermines the prices of consumer goods and services. Everythingelse is a secondary effect. Competitive and sound money is expressed in sound value units inwhich consumer goods and services are priced out. Such units tendto remain sound enough only if not subject to governmentmanipulation and legislation but rather to consumer sovereignty,freedom of choice and freedom of contract. If any kind of coinage, without rare metal value, or paper money,or credit card or clearing account, on paper or electronic, doesrepresent goods and services ready for sale, and if it is issued& managed by the providers of the goods and services, or theirchosen agent, a local bank of issue, established by thesuppliers, then, under freedom, a balance between the quantity ofgoods and services and the quantity of competing currencies isautomatically established and preserved - if only some stableenough value standards are used for the currencies and prices andwages. The balance is then as automatic as is the balance between theprovision of e.g. theatre, cinema, sports stadium, railway, busand aeroplane tickets is with the number of seats provided bythem. More cannot be pushed into circulation nor is adeflationary under-supply to be feared for them - or for soundand competitively issued local currencies provided by thesuppliers of ready for sale goods and services. The proper, freely transferable issues of certificates for capital goods are not currencies but capital securities, insuitable denominations and quantities, properly market rated andpublicized. Such securities should never be given any monopolyor legal tender power, especially not in spheres for which theyare not representative or suitable at all. Capital goods certificates are useful as means of payment only tothe extent that they are daily required as means of payment forthe purchase of capital goods and for such purchases for the nextfew days. How many of such bonds, shares or mortgage letterscould at any time be issued, and maintain their value at par,would depend upon circumstances. Interest coupons, redeemablewithin a few days, have also sometimes been uses as means ofpayment, when other means of payment were short, especially asmeans of payment towards those who had to redeem them. The acquisition of capital goods is not as urgent for mostpeople, most of the times, as their acquisition of bread, milk,meat, vegetables, fruits and other consumer goods and services. Sound savings and investments are possible and maximized onlyonce the daily turnovers of goods, services and labour are freelymediated by sound competing currencies. Whenever turnover creditsand currencies for consumer goods and services are in shortsupply ( when there are sales difficulties for shops and degreesof unemployment ) then the capital market is prone to collapseand can never fully develop. The ultimate purpose of the capital market is the efficientprovision of goods and services. If the turnovers of goods andservices are insufficient, then the capital markets will,inevitably, be disturbed, too. Who wants to invest in capitalgoods that produce consumer goods which cannot be readily sold? To then inject new capital securities will not cure the basicinsufficiency in turnovers of goods and services ( includinglabour ). All monetary legislation that passes new rules, rather thanrepealing the old ones, and that ignores monetary freedomfeatures, is inevitably despotic and thus ultimatelyself-defeating. Ulrich von Beckerath did also point out that the existingdeflation, worsened by the revolutionary condition, which drivespeople into further hoarding rare metal coins, was not abolishedbut rather worsened when legal tender paper money was issued,since most people still remembered the paper money of John Law'stime. Furthermore, the large denominations in which the Assignatswere issued, at least initially, were not suitable for the dailyneeds of consumers but their very issue was enough to frightenmore coins out of circulation, thus reducing sales and increasingunemployment in the absence of freedom to issue alternative meansof exchange and of knowledge of how best and most safely to doso. White describes well some aspects and the results of monetarydespotism but not its essential preconditions : legal tender andthe issue monopoly, nor its radical alternative : full monetaryfreedom. He failed to explore and detail alternatives to themoney of monetary despotism - apart from rare metal coinage. Nordid he show much awareness of the clearing options that can makecoins as well as paper money largely unnecessary. He did not distinguish between "additional purchasing power" thatis coercive and fictitious and additional purchasing power thatrepresents the goods and services ready for sale and is issued bythose providing them, directly or indirectly. No government or other monpolist or coercer can rightlysubstitute his "currency" for the monies of monetary freedom. Butwhat he can do is cause inflations, deflations and stagflations. On page 27 White quotes M. Matrineau. This constitutionalisttalks as if a forced and exclusive currency were not a sufficientproof for despotism of a monetary kind - never mind otherconstitutional and legal arrangements and "safeguards". If yougive to anyone blank cheques upon your account then allsubsequent safeguards against his abuse of these cheques willsooner or later fail. We make a similar mistake when we allow anygovernment or central bank to draw upon all our property, labourand services with its arbitrarily issued and valued assignmentsupon them. Page 29 : Only legal tender is easy to issue and over-issue. Onecannot easily issue refusable and market rated competing privatecurrencies nor easily over-issue them. Their acceptance and theirvalue are not enforced. They are tickets, not "requisitioningcertificates". In the middle of the same page he shares the usual prejudiceagainst "speculators". Page 42 : Doubling the money is harmful only if it is legaltender and an exclusive currency. Otherwise it cannot be forcedupon anyone at par but will rather be rejected or discounted,while prices, expressed in sound standards, will remain the same,for all remaining sound currencies. Only in the discountedcurrency, not used as a value standard, will prices rise, untilthis currency is generally refused and replaced by soundcompeting currencies. The general price level, expressed in asound value standard and payable in alternative media, is notinflated by a depreciated and optional, i.e., discountable andrefusable currency. He hints at "emergency money" issues in Paris, in the middle ofpage 48, but fails to provide sufficient details on them. Withmonetary ignorance and prejudice as wide-spread, most of themwere probably as ill founded as the assignats were. In Note 23 hepoints out that samples of these "confidence bills" can be seenin the Cornell University Library. Who can supply me with goodphotocopies of them? Page 50 et al : Like many libertarians today he decries the cryfor more circulating medium, without making a distinction betweencompetitive sound money and compulsory and fictitious"greenbacks". Page 54 : Among the many definitions, correct and incorrect ones,of "Gresham's Law", to be collected and criticized orappreciated, belongs the unusual one by White : "... the superiorcurrency had been withdrawn because an inferior currency could beused." He does not mention, though, that without legal tender theinferior currency could not be so used but would, instead, bedriven out by the better money. Page 55 : When further inflation is anticipated in the setting ofprices then prices tend to run ahead of the printing presses, sothat the current circulation cannot, indeed, purchase all goodsand services at thus inflated prices. Such deflationary effectsare very common in progressive inflations. Only verbally areinflation and deflation absolute opposites. Page 78 : Ulrich von Beckerath mentioned a French study of ascholar who had examined the remaining court records. Accordingto this, in the MAJORITY of cases of conviction to punishment bythe Guillotine, some argument about prices and the value ofassignats was involved and of the trusthworthiness or corruptionof those who issued the assignats and made them compulsory andgave them a ficticious value. The value of Louisd'ors gold coinson the black market turned them into effective propaganda piecesagainst this republic and its forced paper currency. If I couldget it, I would gladly microfiche a copy of this dissertation. In short, Andrew Dickson White teaches us much but not enoughabout inflation, its causes and cure. PIOT, J. Z., 31.Dec.,1997.