International Issues | |
How The U.S. Suppressed Competing Currencies |
Prior to the Civil War, many banks in the United States issued their own paper money. Banknotes carried a promise to pay the bearer on demand in gold or silver coin -- as did Federal Reserve Notes until recent decades. Some Americans distrusted any of these promissory notes, which were worthless if the bank failed. However, many consumers considered some state banknotes just as desirable as their national bank counterparts.
But during the war, the U.S. Congress imposed a 10 percent tax on any notes issued by state-chartered or incorporated banks, deliberately forcing state banks out of the paper currency business and making the regulation and issuance of currency a prerogative of the federal government and of federally-chartered national banks. The tax had the desired effect: five years later, the U.S. currency system had changed dramatically -- fewer than 300 state banks remained, none of which issued notes. One "benefit" of the tax was that by reducing the amount of competing currency in circulation it offset the inflationary effects of the new greenbacks -- fiat currency that wasn't redeemable in gold or silver. And it is generally believed the tax helped finance the Civil War by stimulating bond sales to national banks. But some economists think the public might have been better off had state banks retained their right to issue currency. Source: George Selgin, "The Suppression of State Banknotes: A Reconsideration," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, October 2000. For more on Economic Inquiry http://www.ei.oupjournals.org/ For more on Currency Issues http://www.ncpa.org/pi/internat/intdex2.html |
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate
Central | Contact Us
Dallas Headquarters: 12655 N. Central Expy., Suite 720 -
Dallas, TX 75243-1739 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office:
655 15th St. N.W., Suite 375 - Washington, DC 20005 - 202/628-6671 - Fax
202/628-6474
© 2001
NCPA