Mental Baby Bush...

...has declared that the world needs to be littered with nuclear plants, spreading that criminal shit even wider than those revisionist dog heaps mentioned in the preceding post. Our valiant John Zube, more outspoken against the "peaceful" nuclear folly than any other libertarian you may run into, even than some Greens in power these latter-day days, leads a quixotic battle, not in general, but in one case, against one of his compatriots (or in Zubish panarchist parlance: prison inmates), let's name him Keith, because that is his first name which he is sharing with others. As a jailbird he is seemingly enjoying his life sentence. An exuberant joy I can only attribute to the stock he must hold in the enterprise.

This Keith now is as obtuse on this and other matters as John is stubborn in trying to convince him, John the noble missionary never giving up, even in front of the most unredeemable sinner. So those several who are witnesses to the correspondence between the two get first rate entertainment making their freedombound prison life slightly more bearable, as unnerving it may be that John doesn't follow my repeated advice to give that battle against "windmills" (so to speak!) up.

Among the many treats let me quote the following most recent one. Keith, in one of his victory-minded messages, had jubilated about the news item "Lithuanian president: To achieve economic independence Lithuania needs new nuclear reactor". John's answer now:

"Dear Keith,

I find all kinds of nonsense taught and practised in law, politics, economics, ethics, the arts, fashions, religions, psychology, warfare, revolutions, "education", philosophy, medicine, biology, in diets, life-styles etc., etc. So why should nuclear "scientist[s]" be the exception, rather than the rule?

Against a regime like that of Hitler or the Japanese empire they had nothing better to propose than "nuclear weapons", which shows already, that they were soft in the head.
Too much exposure to radiation from radioactive substances?

The first and rather risky nuclear reactor experiment was set off close to or within Chicago, I believe in its university grounds! Which, again, showed to me that these "scientists" neither think nor care sufficiently.

If you think that nuclear reactors are so good for you, why don't you creep into one, thus serving your fellow human beings by being turned into energy?

Or if you still plan to have children, place a packet of unshielded isotopes near your privates, in the hope that the resulting mutations will be supermen or supergirls.

Why not also start a new religion, worshipping nuclear power?
Which would mean something like a return to the worship of the "Sun god".

Be consistent!

As a libertarian, anarchist and panarchist, I am not interested in territorial national independence and its various spleens and wrongs, except in trying to render them harmless, by confining them only to their genuine volunteers.

PIOT, John."

To this he got the answer:

"Dear johnzube You are certainly eloquent. Consistency is not much of a quality if you are consistently wrong. The Lithuanians are building a new nuc reactor after experiencing old Russian ones. Are they crazy? You carefully dont comment on this.
People who quote Hitler & Holacausts [CB: holla! as the Germans say][CB: Don't forget to bring me several, Minna, I am tempted to call to my virtual skivvy just leaving for the super-market or eBay] in ordinary correspondence should be examined especially those who do it repeatedly!!!! With kund regards & best wishes keith......." [CB: last name considerately withheld]

Keith has his own consistency, always being beside the point, totally escaping it. Affaire à suivre or maybe crawling back (not as far back as the Stone Age Keith is working on bringing us back to eventually) to previous exchanges I may post here. So that you can "examine" them, as this is "ordinary" correspondence. ;-)

So much for the time being for mental Baby Bush's mental offspring...